Adam

Too Many Academic Degrees?

 Posted by at 12:36 pm  No Responses »
Sep 062012
 

The writing staff here at NPS are all college graduates and most of our readers are also similarly “educated”. Why did we go on to higher education, especially a school as expensive as UW-Madison? For most people, the answer is something about getting better jobs.

On the same hand, we are inundated with articles about how college graduates are un- or under- employed and the trend is very slow to change. For some graduates, like those of law schools, it’s even worse news. Roughly 50% of all students have a job within nine (9!) months of graduating, a frightfully long time when you have bills to pay (including your student loans…)

So what’s the problem? Do we not have enough jobs for these individuals? Is our education system a mess? Well, the answer to the last question is clearly yes, however, I believe the answer is not what you think.

Mike Rowe, of Dirty Job fame, published an open letter to Governor Mitt Romney explaining his take on the US job market.

 Even as unemployment remains sky high, a whole category of vital occupations has fallen out of favor, and companies struggle to find workers with the necessary skills. The causes seem clear. We have embraced a ridiculously narrow view of education. Any kind of training or study that does not come with a four-year degree is now deemed “alternative.”

Rowe has a laundry list of experiencing working tough jobs across the country in a variety of industries and highlighting the resolve, tenacity, and fortitude of many working Americans. His claims are centered around the idea that there are plenty of great paying jobs to be found, if only one knows where to look.

Many viable careers once aspired to are now seen as “vocational consolation prizes,” and many of the jobs this current administration has tried to “create” over the last four years are the same jobs that parents and teachers actively discourage kids from pursuing. (I always thought there something ill-fated about the promise of three million “shovel ready jobs” made to a society that no longer encourages people to pick up a shovel.)

Most of our audience is pursuing a college education or has already received their degrees and I’m not urging anyone to throw down their current job and become a plumber. I’m sharing this because it is important to note that better education systems does NOT mean more people go to traditional 4 year schools. Raw enrollment numbers are not the answer and we are remiss in thinking that more college graduates on their own are going to solve problems.

We need people who see opportunity where opportunity exists. We need enthusiasm for careers that have been overlooked and underappreciated by society at large. We need to have a really big national conversation about what we value in the workforce

 

 

Let me know your thoughts!

Sep 052012
 

It’s that time of year again, folks.

Flamingos grace Bascom Hill, Montay Ball is running people over, and ASM is about to kick into full swing.

And, as has become tradition the past few sessions, we have a new ASM Constitution up for discussion! Now, in full transparency, I was a big supporter of the Constitution that was drafted by ASM and failed to be ratified my freshman year in 2008. I was also a big supporter of semi-secret pushes to get that Constitution back on the ballot the following year. Last year, the Associated Students of Madison Constitutional Committee (ACC) faced a stunning amount of criticism for their carefully crafted and neutrally conceived plan at overhauling the aging document. However, last year was an extraordinarily rare case of extreme ineptitude. Frankly, ASM Representatives last year made the Wisconsin Assembly look like an institution that was filled with dignity and respect.

Yet, we enter this year under different leadership and the auspices of a fresh start. Chair Andrew Bulovsky is a veteran of ASM, with a large amount of on the ground organizing experience (I watched him single-handedly run a campaign that we usually draft a whole committee to do) and with a knack for leadership (previously Chair of University Affairs, and the Vice-Chair of Student Council before becoming Chair). Similarly, Council has a lot of veteran faces returning with a wealth of experience. However, with that experience comes temperance. Some of the most fiery and divisive members of each “side” are off Council which should allow cooler heads to be the mouthpieces. Similarly, I think we are all sick of fighting and there is a sense of needing to “Get Shit Done” that has been missing from student government.

So, here we are with a brand New Constitution. It’s linked in full in case you would like to read it verbatim. Having read a few of these in my time, I’ve taken out a few choice tidbits and editorialized them.

3 Likes

  • Executive Branch
    • It is no secret that I’ve been a fan of the Presidential system for awhile. Every other UW school uses it. Nearly all other universities our size use it. It just makes sense. Part of the problem with ASM’s current structure is a lack of accountability. A directly elected President is a great way to increase the “skin in the game” for the average student. They have a face to put to the name ASM. The Chair of ASM is currently a pseudo-executive anyway; with many of the responsibilities but none of the public accountability. I would like to establish this as a separate branch. For those concerned about cronyism or shady dealings: all appointees must be confirmed by the Senate AKA the EXACT same process we have right now. So I think it’s a disingenuous complaint.
  • Veto authority
    • With a Presidency, you need teeth to make the position valuable and effective. A veto should be a weighty tool; one that is rarely used and when it is, should be in absolute necessity. To affect that, the veto is overturnable by a vote of the Senate. Gives power and authority to the Presidency and allows it to actually function as a position of policy and not merely the PR branch of the Senate
  • 2 Year Terms
    • Giving Senators a longer term length is a great idea. Many student government folks really start to do their best work going into their second year and we need to keep these folks involved! Staggering the elections allows for some continuity and prevents one Senate from coming in that has no idea what the last Senate did. Institutional memory is severely lacking in student governments and I love this idea to remedy that.

Meh

  • I’d like to see something more in the Shared Governance section. While touching on the big topics like local school control of appointees and oversight, I would like to see explicit references to ASM as the SOLE umbrella organization for fulfilling 36.09(5) on our campus. I know that, in the past and in the present, UW Legal and some organizations (cough, Wisconsin Union, cough) have argued that ASM is not the only Shared Governance body on campus which creates a lot of headaches. I’d like some more closure.

 

 

So that’s my quick hitting reaction. In substance, it’s similar to previous year’s efforts, which I think is a good thing.  I’m really looking forward to seeing what happens here.

 

If you have comments on the new Constitution or my analysis, please leave a comment or go to the ASM Student Council Meeting tonight (6:30pm in the Hearing Room of the SAC) to speak your mind!

Welcome Class of 2016!

 Posted by at 8:00 am  No Responses »
Sep 052012
 

Welcome to North Park Street! Whether you are a fresh-on-campus freshman in Witte or a senior boldly living the Doty Street life, North Park Street seeks to bring you relevant UW/Madison opinions and analysis. Many friends of the site know our authors’ style and the topics they like to write on frequently. I hope that you decide to stick around our little slice of Madison and become friends as well.

So who are we?

We’re a group of alumni who are still very close to the campus community and have had long careers in different organizations on campus. Student Government, youth professional organizations, grassroots organizing groups, political advocacy groups, fencing groups; you name it, one of our authors has at least a story to tell about it.

We’re a site dedicated to expanding campus discourse and discussion beyond the bounds that currently exist. Sometimes the opinion pages of the Badger Herald and Daily Cardinal just don’t cut it for getting a variety of opinions on the table. We pride ourselves with the wide range of opinions that we bring to the table and firmly believe that, through interaction in the comments and through email exchanges, we are fostering an important campus community.

But we need your help.

Without you, our readers and our friends, we cannot thrive. Like what we’re talking about on here? Let us know! Pissed off about how I or Brandon misconstrued something you did or just think we flat out got something wrong? Let us know! That sort of open conversation is near impossible to find on our campus but we can make it happen.

So, new reader; come back tomorrow and check out our new posts. Let your friends know your inside source on information. Most importantly, get involved.

Jul 232012
 

As many of you have undoubtedly heard, the NCAA and the Big Ten Conference have handed down their punishments to Penn State for the Sandusky Scandal that has dominated news narratives of collegiate athletics and the nation at large for the better part of a year. What happened was a tragedy. A horrific and chilling example of what can happen when serious crimes are not taken seriously and reputation is put before what is right. It is also an example of what can happen when athletics have too much power in academic institutions.

While many around the country talk about what these rulings mean for Penn State, I’m writing about what this means for Wisconsin, and not just on the gridiron. As a rising national power in football and perennials powers in basketball, and hockey, Wisconsin sports have taken a prominent position both locally and nationally. With that, there is the natural, and justified, concern that athletics is taking too prominent a position in college sports; that the term student-athlete is less about the student, and more about the athlete.

Wisconsin faced a similar situation as Penn  State did with the publication of UW Athletics official John Chadima’s inappropriate conduct with student employees. While obviously very different than the Jerry Sandusky incidents, Chadima’s case was a chilling affirmation that the UW does not have a spotless and sterling record. However, the UW did not try to cover up the incident. Chadima was immediately placed on leave (which he then resigned from), and an independent investigation was called for by the school.  Kudos to the UW for that.

Wisconsin needs to be in front of this, and lead the way in changing the “football first” culture. Overall, I think the UW is on the “safe” side of the “football culture” battle. We are not like SEC schools where winning a National Title is more important than literally anything else. But we’re flirting with the line. Beloved Athletic Director Barry Alvarez frequently parks very near to a statue of himself (like Joe Paterno did) and head football coach Bret Bielema is not an overly large member of the campus community like fellow coach Bo Ryan is.

Additionally, the next Chancellor needs the fortitude and inner strength to take on a wildly popular athletic director and a rising football program. We need a Chancellor unafraid to take the right steps, even if they may be detrimental to athletic success. Preferably, we would like a Chancellor with previous experience leading or managing major Division 1 institutions.

But what does this mean for football?

Clearly, such a monumental decision will have a tremendous impact on Badger football and while the lessons the UW can learn from this case are important, many of our students and fans are eager to discuss how this will impact the most visible part of the NCAA sanctions: the football program.

Good news abounds for Bucky and friends. We all might as well book hotel rooms in Indy right now because the Badgers seem like the clear (only?) team to win the Leaders division. Ohio State and Penn State are ineligible and so our only challengers are Purdue, Illinois, and Indiana. Yep, seems like a solid bet.

However, it is important that the Badgers remain focused. Sloppy play encouraged by complacancy could take Bucky out of the national title hunt, and we do not want to be “Asterik Champions” who lose to both Ohio State and Penn State before getting into the championship by default. Let’s go out and rock their socks like it still was relevant.

Additionally, the Badgers may scoop up some major talent from Penn State. One of the conditions of the sanctions was that all players may immediately transfer to other major schools without sitting out 1 year as is usually the case. While possible, it seems like that many current players will remain with the team, but the best value could lie in this year’s incoming freshman class with several VERY highly recruited players now tempted away from a team that they could never advance into the postseason.

You have to wonder how many phone calls Beilema and his staff have already made…

 

Jul 182012
 

Obviously, the title is a misnomer. High Speed Rail has the potential to revitalize train travel as an affordable alternative to air travel, and as a tall man, anything we can do to encourage less travel in those sardine cans is fine by me. But the real point isn’t about us, it’s about what we buy. We’re Americans aren’t we?

Perusing Reddit today, I came across this article from the Economist expressing concern over America’s rush towards high speed rail (or rather, ourtalking about going to high speed rail).

The emergence of express intercity rail services may cause the freight railways the biggest problem of all…The trouble for the freight railways is that almost all the planned new fast intercity services will run on their tracks. Combining slow freight and fast passenger trains is complicated.

The article talks about a few other large points, and I learned quite a bit about the American freight rail system. We have the best freight system in the world (recognized in the industry) and this industry does face a threat from high speed rail.

I’m not arguing for or against high speed rail, and I don’t think that Governor Walker sending federal funds for a Wisconsin HSR system back to the fed was a good idea, but its important to keep in mind the extreme challenges and problems with implementing high speed rail.